You Don't Need to Score
100% of Calls
Your competitor scores 100% of calls and brags about it. You sample 40% with statistical rigor and get more accurate data at a fraction of the cost. Who's actually winning?
The Real Comparison
Why Big Tech Sells "Score Every Call"
It's not because you need it. It's because their seat license model requires it.
Seat Licenses Need Volume
Big Tech charges per seat. To justify that cost to 5,000-seat centers, they have to promise "100% coverage." You're a 75-agent center paying for that same waste.
Cheap Models for Volume
To score 100% of calls affordably, they use cheaper, faster, less accurate AI models. More calls scored ≠ better data when accuracy drops.
No Statistical Improvement
After a certain sample size, scoring more calls doesn't improve your data quality. It's just waste—calls that don't move your QA metrics.
Let's Do the Numbers
A 75-agent center taking 10,000 calls/month. Who gets better data?
Higher statistical validity. 60% less cost. Higher accuracy on every call scored.
Premium AI.
Statistical Rigor.
We use the highest-quality, most expensive LLMs available. We can afford to because we're not trying to score 10,000 calls for pennies each. The result? 96% accuracy that Big Tech can't match.
Premium LLMs Only
We use the most advanced AI models available. No cutting corners to hit volume targets.
96% Accuracy (±3%)
Statistically validated scoring that you can actually trust for coaching decisions.
Statistical Sampling
Score the right percentage to achieve validity—not every call just because you can.
Pay for What Matters
Usage-based pricing means you're not funding wasted processing on calls that don't improve your metrics.
AI Model Quality Comparison
Accuracy vs. volume tradeoff
Better Data. Lower Cost.
Statistical sampling with premium AI delivers higher validity than brute-force scoring with cheap models.
96% Accuracy
Every call we score is scored right. No garbage-in-garbage-out from cheap models trying to hit volume.
70-80% Cost Savings
Pay for evaluations that matter, not volume for volume's sake. Usage-based means no waste.
Higher Statistical Validity
96% accuracy with ±3% confidence beats 80% accuracy at 100% coverage. Better data, not just more data.
Faster Insights
Premium models process faster and more accurately. No waiting for 10,000 calls to grind through cheap AI.
Built for Your Size
75 agents? 150? You don't need enterprise volume. You need accurate data at a price that makes sense.
Your QA Forms
Use your existing evaluation criteria. We adapt to your process, not the other way around.
"Enterprise vendors sell '100% call coverage' to 5,000-seat centers who can afford the waste. You're a 75-agent center. Why pay to score calls that don't move your QA metrics?"
See How the Math Works for YouStop Paying for Waste
Get more accurate QA data at a fraction of the cost. Statistical sampling + premium AI beats brute-force volume every time.